💎 Special Offer: starting from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

New satellite imagery from the Russian port of Azov shows damaged Russian tankers and cargo vessels gathered along the shoreline. After being destroyed in the massive Ukrainian strike campaign to cut off Crimea from the sea, many were towed back into ports, with Russian hoping they could still be repaired. In practice however, Russian crews are effectively dragging maritime corpses back to shore, only to send out more vessels along the same routes, and into the Ukrainian killing fields in the sea of Azov. This has become Russia’s maritime version of its suicidal frontal assaults on land, with fresh vessels sent forward while damaged and crippled ships from failed past blockade runs are dragged back to port.

The strike footage explains why the port is filling, as Ukrainian forces reported hitting over one-hundred and seventy-nine Russian vessels in only two weeks. Ukrainian footage shows drones moving from one Russian vessel to the next, clearly showing how quickly the attacks accumulate. Separate footage shows one ship burning in the Sea of Azov and another still flying the Russian flag after being struck. The Babylon cargo ship provides the clearest close view, with the remains of an exploded drone lodged in its side and fire damage or another impact visible inside. The pace of losses is not slowing down, with Russians losing almost the same number of ships every day, meaning that many more will soon be promoted to submarine. At this point, every Russian ship entering these waters follows scores of others that had already been hit, yet Moscow kept sending in the next.

Recent upgrades to the FP one and FP two drones are one of several improvements increasing the effectiveness of Ukrainian strikes against Russian vessels. Both models have received terminal guidance and automatic target acquisition, allowing their onboard systems to identify a moving ship and correct the flight path during the final approach. Russians have been trying to counter the drones by mounting machine guns and electronic warfare emitters on vessels to shoot them down or sever the operator’s control signal. Once the target has been acquired, however, the drone can continue the attack autonomously even if that signal is lost. The operator brings the drone onto the vessel, and the onboard system then keeps the target centered through the final seconds of flight, raising the accuracy of the strike.

With Russians now actively dragging damaged ships back to port for repairs, Ukraine has begun striking the tugboats that are sent out. These tugboats move toward disabled tankers and cargo ships so they can be evacuated, however released footage shows that Ukrainian forces are now destroying between one and two of them each day. Without a tugboat, the original ship remains stranded, repairs cannot begin, and damage that might have been temporary becomes permanent. Russia must then send another recovery vessel into the same threatened waters, reproducing the suicide assault pattern at sea as one casualty pulls a second ship forward and risks turning the rescue mission into another loss.
This intense pressure has already reduced the ferry crossings over the Kerch strait by a reported seventy five percent, leaving some vessels out of service and others only able to move if they are dragged back and forth by the tugboats.

Overall, Russia now faces a choice between reducing maritime traffic and continuing to feed more vessels into a campaign that has already made losses routine. Even when no ship is hit, tighter sailing schedules and heavier protection will reduce how much cargo can pass through the Sea of Azov. As the number of usable ships falls, ports will spend more time handling damaged vessels and less time moving cargo. Ukraine can therefore keep cutting Russian maritime capacity without sinking every target, because every damaged ship held in port is one less vessel available for the next voyage.

💎 Special Offer: starting from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

In this video, we will analyze how false Russian claims ended in the biggest disaster of the year.

Here, Russia is claiming the city of Kostiantynivka has been captured, and the Ukrainian defense has been overrun. However, piles of Russian bodies and Russians begging Ukraine for a ceasefire suggest something else is happening, as Ukraine found a devastating way to answer Russian claims.

High-ranking Russian officials claimed up to ninety-six percent of Kostiantynivka is under Russian control, presenting staged flag-raising videos in the northern districts as proof that Ukrainian units holding the area have collapsed. Yet Ukrainian footage shows something completely different, as geolocated videos demonstrate Ukrainian troops operating across northern, central, and southern parts of the city, while active fighting continues throughout the town. Still, official Russian sources continue to insist that only isolated Ukrainian holdouts remain in basements and peripheral districts, with their clearance being only a matter of time. Despite these claims, even Russian military analysts now compare the announcement about Kostiantynivka capture to the fake capture claim of Kupiansk in November of last year. These doubts are confirmed by Russia’s own artillery footage showing active shelling of Ukrainian positions in areas that the Russian military claims is under full Russian control.

This goes further than just the public backlash from their own side, as in response to the Russian claims, Ukrainians massively intensified their shelling of Russian positions as punishment. Geolocated footage shows a Ukrainian Mig Twenty-nine is destroying a building used as a Russian drone base, while a Ukrainian Mirage Two-thousand struck a substation where Russian infantry was massing for further assaults. Ukrainian artillery has been continuously buildings used as infiltration hideouts, while heavy bomber drones, FPV, and reconnaissance drones monitor every approach and attack every movement.

As a result, Russia’s premature victory claim has made the disaster worse, as the Russian command was forced to sending new infiltrators forward in large numbers. Just like what happened around Kupiansk, Russian commanders now face immense pressure to make reality match their false symbolic claims, as soldiers are sent forward to hold on to the claim that the city is under Russian control. Instead, Ukrainian drones, artillery, and aircraft hunt them while they move between ruins, attempt to reinforce positions, or wait for orders.

The clearest evidence about how things really are on the ground comes from the Russians themselves, as footage filmed by a Russian assault soldier shows him moving along what has effectively become a path of death. Dozens of Russian bodies lie within meters of each other, piled along both sides of the route into Kostiantynivka. The approaches and the streets are becoming a graveyard in which the infiltrating Russians have nowhere to hide from the Ukrainian drone strikes.

The losses have become so severe that the Russian Defense Ministry has now begged Ukraine to halt its shelling of the city. Russians claim they want to stop Ukrainians shooting, so that they can supposedly evacuate civilians and recover bodies. However, the real reason is that a ceasefire would silence precisely the Ukrainian strike-and-search system that prevents Russia from gaining control of Kostiantynivka. The humanitarian pretext is an excuse to indirectly beg Ukrainians to stop shooting at their overwhelmed soldiers, as such significant losses are causing footholds to slip out of their control.

This is particularly distrustful, as Russia did not demand a ceasefire while its bombs and drones were destroying Kostiantynivka as the siege began. It was Ukraine that conducted the civilian evacuations, dedicating sparse armored vehicles under great risk to move residents out of the town. It was Ukrainian soldiers who had to clear Russian drones laying in ambush on the evacuation roads out of Kostiantynivka, while Russian operators attacked any movement regardless of whether vehicles carried soldiers or civilians. Only when Russian bodies began piling up did their commanders begin begging Ukraine for a pause to the fighting.

Overall, the Russian capture claim serves a political purpose, strengthening Russia’s position before the world audience. But the Russian command has repeatedly shown that after announcing imaginary victories, it will sacrifice thousands of soldiers trying to make them real, and Kostiantynivka is becoming the next example. Russia declared victory, intensified infiltrations, and watched its troops die faster, then effectively started asking Ukraine to stop firing long enough for them to advance...

💎 Help us expand the coverage! Subscription starts from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

Today, there are important updates from the Russian Federation. 

Russian military channels are reacting with anger to the Russian retreat around Liman, where Ukrainian counterattacks have erased Russian gains west of the Zherebets River. Kremlin-affiliated commentators acknowledge in panic the Ukrainian initiative around the sector while criticizing exaggerated Russian reporting, demanding that Russian commanders be hanged. The embarrassment became particularly visible at Sviatohirsk, claimed captured by Putin, based on AI-fabricated videos of Russian soldiers inside the town, only for the Third Army Corps commander Andriy Biletskyi to subsequently film himself walking there openly, demonstrating continued Ukrainian control and the relative safety inside that allowed him not to wear a helmet. For Russian analysts, the deeper problem is that fabricated victories eventually corrupt battlefield decision-making. Once one Russian commander reports an imaginary advance, neighboring units and higher headquarters begin planning around territory that Russia does not actually control. A Russian analyst explicitly warned that falsely declaring settlements captured can prevent Russian forces from striking them because headquarters believes friendly troops are present there, which gives the Ukrainians more freedom to operate.

The consequences multiply, as artillery may withhold fire from Ukrainian positions incorrectly marked as Russian. Reinforcements can be ordered toward supposedly friendly strongpoints only to encounter Ukrainian ambushes. Supply vehicles can follow routes assumed to be secured but actually covered by Ukrainian drones. Russian assault groups can also receive objectives based on imaginary starting lines, while reserves are committed to rescuing positions that were never held. Eventually, commanders must conduct emergency crisis management, consuming several times the manpower that an accurate assessment might have required.

Russian commentators therefore increasingly demand punishment and accountability for officers responsible for these beautiful fake reports that make their way up to the Kremlin. The Sviatohirsk episode made the absurdity especially obvious and catalyzed Russian discontent, as the fabricated footage purporting to demonstrate Russian presence was torn to pieces by Biletsky’s appearance.

The pattern resembles earlier Russian information failures around Kupiansk, when Russian sources repeatedly presented infiltrations and flag-raising footage as evidence of much deeper control, including material that analysts assessed as AI-generated. Yet Ukrainian clearing operations continued, contradicting the picture of secure Russian control. Similar paradoxes have appeared in the Dnipropetrovsk Region, as Ukrainian counteroffensives during the previous months reversed significant Russian gains, while geolocated evidence showed Ukrainian troops operating where Russian sources had previously claimed advances. Around Stepnohirsk in Zaporizhzhia, a Kremlin-affiliated military analyst admitted that false reporting had actually prevented Russian forces from properly establishing logistics and clearing territory they supposedly controlled. Ukrainian forces subsequently continued contesting positions around the area.

This is why Liman potentially represents something larger than another tactical setback. Russia’s leadership has placed enormous pressure on commanders to demonstrate constant progress. Putin continues publicly portraying Russia as winning, even as independent battlefield assessments show much slower advances and repeated Ukrainian counterattacks and successes. When genuine Russian advances become increasingly expensive, producing impressive reports is easier than producing territorial gains. But once AI-generated videos, manipulated flag-raisings, and fictitious captures enter the operational reporting chain, propaganda begins damaging the army producing it.

Overall, the Russian retreat from Liman and the claimed capture of Sviatohirsk that never materialized are the latest examples of how political leaders can announce victories, headquarters can draw optimistic maps, and commanders can report settlements captured, but Ukrainian soldiers remain there. The resulting outrage among Russian military commentators reflects recognition that somebody must eventually pay for the fiction. When reality finally catches up with the reports, Russian commanders rarely admit that previous victories never happened, as they fear paying the price with their heads, so they sacrifice additional soldiers, trying desperately to make the false map real.

🔴 Our interactive news map: https://www.rfunews.com/map
🔴 Subscribe to unlock full access to the map + exclusive strategic insights: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

Today, the biggest news comes from the Russian Federation.

Here, Ukrainian strikes have forced Russia’s major oil refineries to shut down, bringing fuel production to a halt and pushed the Kremlin to urgently stop all fuel exports. This marks a mission accomplished moment in Ukraine’s refinery campaign, as the effects of those strikes are now crippling the wider Russian fuel system.

Several of Russia’s major oil refineries in central regions have now halted operations or sharply cut output after recent successful Ukrainian attacks on critical processing infrastructure. These are key plants that turn crude oil into gasoline, diesel, and aviation fuel, so once they stop, Russia loses fuel output at the source. Several major refineries were knocked offline within the same stretch of attacks, leaving the rest of the network with less room to cover the missing output.

Production wise, the effect is now visible across a large share of Russia’s refining system. Ryazan alone lost roughly ninety to one hundred percent of its processing capacity after the May fifteenth strike, while the latest damage at Yaroslavl was estimated to affect units covering about eighty to one hundred percent of plant processing volume. Perm was also forced into a full halt after three primary crude processing units were emergency stopped. Once losses of that scale appear across several major refineries at the same time, Russia is no longer dealing with isolated damage, but with a major reduction in the refining capacity still available to balance fuel supply.

With refining output falling across the system, the pressure soon moved into exports and forced Moscow into a longer term tradeoff. Russia imposed its gasoline export ban on April first and will continue to keep it in place till the end of July, so the restrictions had already been running for nearly two months when the latest refinery losses hit. With the gasoline ban in place in April, Russian oil product exports fell by about three hundred forty thousand barrels per day from March to two point two million barrels per day

Ukraine achieved this through a sustained strike campaign against the refinery units that matter most for fuel production. In the first twenty days of May alone, ten major Russian oil sites were hit, and six were forced to halt operations. The campaign became effective because Ukraine kept returning to damaged facilities before repairs could restore output, while also striking the processing sections Russia finds hardest to replace quickly. Perm shows this clearly, because the refinery had already been hit five times by May eighth, including three strikes in one week, before another attack followed on May twelfth that put the refinery out of action. That sequence prevented repairs from stabilizing the site and eventually put a halt to fuel processing. The same method appeared in Yaroslavl and Ryazan, where repeated strikes deepened earlier damage instead of allowing recovery. Yaroslavl was hit three times in May, while Ryazan was struck on May fifteenth in one of the most damaging attacks of the campaign. Kstovo and Syzran were also hit again, adding fresh disruption at major processing sites in Nizhny Novgorod and Samara regions. Kirishi, Primorsk, and several pumping stations were struck as well, which reduced the oil flow reaching the refineries that were still operating. That left the remaining plants processing less crude oil while covering more of the system’s needs, which made delays and bottlenecks harder to avoid.

Overall, Ukraine’s refinery campaign is now forcing Russia to spend more resources protecting fuel infrastructure and restoring damaged plants far behind the front. This pulls air defenses and repair capacity into the energy sector, where repeated strikes keep undoing earlier recovery work and slowing stabilization. As refinery outages continue, fuel distribution becomes harder to manage, increasing pressure on military supply planning across the war effort. Russia now faces a deeper logistical vulnerability inside its own rear, because every new disruption widens the gap between fuel demand and refining capacity.

🔴 Our interactive news map: https://www.rfunews.com/map
🔴 Subscribe to unlock full access to the map + exclusive strategic insights: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

🔴 YOU ARE MISSING HALF OF OUR VIDEOS! Subscribe to unlock all out reports and support our work: https://www.youtube.com/channe....l/UCcNB1tZYpeDetqCad

Today, there are important updates from the Liman direction.

Here, Ukrainian forces have finally managed to cut off the Russian salient west of the Zherbets River by advancing from two sides. As a result, Russian forces are now pinned down in an area without being able to move in reinforcements or evacuate to the east.

Ukrainian counterattacks against both flanks of the Russian salient have narrowed the corridor connecting the Russian spearhead with its rear, leaving it dangerously exposed. Satellite imagery indicates Russian forces are already withdrawing from parts of the western salient around Shandryholove, as elements of Russia’s Second and One-Hundred-Forty-Fourth Motor Rifle Divisions now face a difficult choice: retreat east with limited chance of success or risk losing additional forces as Ukraine tightens its pressure.

The northern flank has deteriorated particularly rapidly, as Ukrainian units have gradually consolidated strongpoints between Nove and Katerynivka. Recent assaults expanded this foothold, with subsequent Russian strike footage itself indicating Ukrainian activity in areas previously under enemy control. Ukraine’s Third Corps then pushed south toward Kolodiazi, and Ukrainian troops captured an important tactical strongpoint in the forest belt north of the settlement, opening approaches toward northwestern Kolodiazi and western Ivanivka. Crucially, this advance allowed Ukrainian forces to cut the Kolodiazi-Ivanivka road completely, while simultaneously Russian forces inside Kolodiazi came under pressure from the south, creating multi-vector threats against the Russian bridgehead.

The southern flank, where Kolodiazi is located, is collapsing under similar pressure, as Ukrainian units counterattacked north of Stavky, and even Russian sources have acknowledged the increasingly dangerous situation, complaining that the entire bridgehead west of the Zherebets has become extremely difficult to sustain and is effectively cut off from the Russian mainland.

As a result, Ukraine has effectively cut the area around Shandryholove off from reliable logistical support. In an attempt to relieve the situation, Russian forces continue striking Ukrainian supply routes, but artillery and drones cannot solve Russia’s fundamental problem: its forward troops need ammunition, food, reinforcements, and casualty evacuation routes of their own.

Footage from the area illustrates what Russian logistics now face, as Russian soldiers attempting to recover wounded troops and bodies must travel along a route repeatedly targeted by Ukrainian drones. What should be a supply road has effectively become a road of death, as everyone moving toward the salient risks detection and destruction, making reinforcement increasingly expensive and evacuation equally dangerous.

However, Ukraine faces its own danger, as the advances forming the pincer are relatively narrow, meaning commanders cannot simply race forward chasing retreating Russians. Narrow penetrations can themselves become vulnerable to counterattacks against their flanks. Ukrainian forces therefore need to widen their gains, consolidate captured strongpoints, and establish secure logistics before attempting deeper exploitation or starting to systematically eliminate isolated Russian groups in the cut-off western part of the salient.

Overall, after Russia consequently risked watching its most important breakthrough in this sector dissolve, Ukrainian pressure from two sides has transformed the Russian offensive spearhead into a liability that is about to turn catastrophic. Eliminating that salient would push Russian forces back toward the river and destroy months of accumulated progress. However, this development also has strategic importance for Liman itself, because if Ukraine consolidates these gains, Russia’s northern pincer to encircle the city will effectively be broken, freeing Ukrainian resources to reinforce the city and concentrate increasingly on pushing back the Russian pincer approaching from the south.

💎 Help us expand the coverage! Subscription starts from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

Today, the biggest news comes from the Sumy direction.

Here, Ukrainian forces are mounting counterattacks eastward after crossing the river. After fierce fighting in this sector, Ukrainian soldiers reentered the village of Kindrativka and pushed toward the rear of Andriivka, aiming to encircle the small settlement, while also retaking a series of treelines inside the village. This came days after Russian infiltrators were expelled from the forested area around Korchakivka. Here, the Russians managed to infiltrate the forest and take up positions there, which allowed them to accumulate and push westward.

However, the scale of Ukraine’s counterattack became visible after these Ukrainian clearing operations inside the forest. Notably, the Ukrainian advance didn’t stop, and further east they managed to fully clear the Russian presence in Marine, which the Russians had managed to infiltrate and gain a foothold in. Recapturing this village allowed the Ukrainians to push towards the village of Yunakivka, where they entrenched themselves in the southern part. As a result, they effectively created a bridgehead for further operations while improving their tactical positions along the frontline in the Sumy direction. After this successful series of counterattacks, Ukrainian special forces of the one hundred and fortieth Special Operations Battalion operating in this sector released footage of their clearing operations. They wore ghillie suits and used the thick vegetation in the forest to conceal their movement during the raid to get as close as possible to the Russian positions without being detected by reconnaissance drones. After they managed to close in on the Russian dugout undetected, a fierce firefight erupted between the Ukrainian operators and the Russian soldiers. The Ukrainians quickly suppressed the Russians with small arms fire, while tactically manoeuvring around them to encircle them while the Russians were pinned down. During this exchange of fire, one Russian soldier was killed, which prompted the Ukrainians to offer the remaining enemy soldier the chance to surrender. Heavily outgunned, the Russian soldier gave up, which allowed the Ukrainian operators to search the dugout and capture a phone, which can be used to extract valuable intelligence.

These Ukrainian counterattacks matter because, if they push the Russians back in the Sumy region, they could threaten a second Kursk offensive. Even the possibility of this happening again is critical for the Russians because, during the first Kursk offensive, Ukraine captured more than a thousand square kilometers of Russian territory, proving Russia is not as invincible as it portrays itself. Ukraine’s recent Vivaldi Operation in the Lyman sector also proved that carefully planned and executed counterattacks can catch the Russians off guard and roll back their advances significantly. Because of this, Russia might send reinforcements from more important sectors, such as Donbas, to reinforce the less vital sector of Sumy in order to try to halt the Ukrainian advances. This would further weaken their offensive potential and reduce their reserves, when their rate of advance has already dropped significantly compared to last year.

Overall, the real danger for Russia is that Ukraine is beginning to turn local counterattacks into a wider problem for the entire Sumy front. If Ukrainian forces keep forcing Russian units out of exposed positions, Moscow may have to spend valuable reserves simply to prevent a larger breakthrough from developing. That would create a difficult choice for Russia to either reinforce Sumy and weaken more important fronts, or accept the risk of another Ukrainian operation deep inside Russian territory. Ukraine does not need to recapture huge amounts of territory here to achieve a major effect because the threat of a breakthrough alone could force Russia to stretch its already limited manpower and reserves even further.

💎 Special Offer: starting from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

Russians have now officially started to dismantle their own air defense, leaving even more gaps for Ukraine to exploit. All of this was done solely to increase the number of strikes on Ukraine, as Russia has begun converting its existing air defense missiles into ground-attack ballistic missiles. According to Ukrainian intelligence, Russia converted around two-hundred missiles in two-thousand-and-twenty-five and plans to convert an additional four-hundred-and-eighty by the end of this year. However, as these missiles were never designed for such ground-attack purposes, their accuracy is horribly ineffective. Additionally, using air defense interceptors as strike weapons creates a serious long-term vulnerability for Russian air defense as a whole, as production capabilities is refocused and repurposed, while Russians already suffer from a serious air defense problem.

Russian air defenses are already placed under significant strain, with Russian military analysts stating that Russia is experiencing a true air defense shortage. Ukrainian saturation tactics using waves of drones and missiles force Russian systems to already expend valuable interceptors, with some units already reporting a shortage. Instead of addressing this shortage, the Russian leadership has decided to prioritize offensive strikes against Ukraine. This decision may exploit Ukraine’s own shortage of ballistic missile interceptors, but it leaves Russia with a thinner and less capable defensive shield of its own, while Ukraine works to strengthen theirs instead. Despite this obvious misalignment of priorities, Russia is now focusing massively on launching as many of them as possible to strike targets across Kyiv.

The latest Russian strike involved twenty-four ballistic missiles, four Zircon missiles, and more than one hundred drones. Russians deployed ballistic missiles with cluster warheads to target warehouses within the city. As a result of the attacks, seventeen people were killed, more than forty were injured, and fire raging for hours.

Simultaneously, Russia is importing additional offensive capacity while prioritizing missiles that weaken or fail to replenish its homeland defense. A North Korean missile unit has recently been deployed to the Voronezh region to support missile strikes against Ukraine. The contingent includes approximately six individual ballistic missile launchers and more than one-hundred-and-twenty ballistic missiles. These North Korean missiles and launchers will soon enable Russia to conduct even larger salvos and more frequent attacks on Ukraine, putting Ukraine’s air defense network under increasing strain.

However, destroying the launchers before firing may be more realistic than attempting to intercept every missile after launch. Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha has declared that North Korean missile installations or systems deployed to attack Ukraine are legitimate military targets. President Volodymyr Zelensky has additionally made a decree to prioritize the destruction of Russian ballistic missile launchers to reduce the number of strikes against Ukraine. Zelensky stressed that Ukrainian forces already know how to track the locations of the launchers with the help of Western intelligence support. At the same time, Ukraine is working together with European partners to produce an anti-ballistic missile air-defense system as a long-term solution. The interceptor missiles of the Freya system will be manufactured domestically by Fire Point, while its radar and sensors would be supplied by Europe. This would help to reduce Ukraine’s dependence on the US-made Patriot system with a domestic alternative. If this new air defense system is successfully developed and mass-produced, while Ukraine strikes Russia’s launchers, Ukraine could significantly reduce the number of successful ballistic missile strikes. Moscow is now exploiting Ukraine’s temporary shortage, but it is encouraging Ukraine to destroy Russian launchers and accelerate a European replacement for Patriot.

Overall, diverting air defense interceptors into ground-attack missiles is Russia’s biggest mistake, because they are trading long-term homeland protection for short-term strike capacity against Ukraine. Every gap in Russian protection, which they voluntarily make, creates additional opportunities for Ukraine, which they can exploit. Additionally, importing North Korean missiles increases short-term attack volume but does nothing to repair the growing defensive vulnerability inside Russia. Russia is trying to exploit Ukraine’s temporary shortage by creating a potentially longer-term shortage in its own defensive system.

💎 Special Offer: starting from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

In this video, we will analyze why Russia is preparing to see the frontlines in Crimea.

Here, the situation became so dire for the Russians that they started to fear a full-scale attack from the Black Sea. Now, they are digging in and preparing for the worst as the peninsula grows more exposed by the day.

Recently, Russia has become alarmed about Crimea and started the construction of a Black Sea wall to defend the peninsula against a Ukrainian attack from the Black Sea. Notably, Russian forces installed dragon’s teeth on beaches along the coastline, turning coastal areas into fortified zones. The reinforced concrete anti-tank obstacles were placed directly on the beach to impede the movement of tanks and mechanized infantry. The construction proves that Russia feels the urgency to build new fortifications before Ukraine exploits the situation.

In the short term, these defenses were designed to counter Ukrainian raids and special forces incursions, an understandable concern given that such operations have already occurred repeatedly. However, the newly built dragon’s teeth fortifications are largely ineffective against this type of threat.
Ukrainian special forces raids in Crimea are typically fast, small-scale, and multi-domain, combining maritime insertion, reconnaissance, sabotage, and rapid strike actions. Teams move covertly across the Black Sea, often switching to low-profile craft near the coast, and operate under the cover of darkness or poor weather. They are frequently supported by drones for surveillance and targeting, as well as intelligence from partisan networks. Once ashore, they aim to disable radar and electronic warfare systems, striking isolated assets or gathering intelligence before rapidly withdrawing. Crucially, these operations are defined by speed and dispersal, making static coastal barriers like dragon’s teeth largely irrelevant. Their limitations suggest that the deeper Russian concern driving these fortifications is not small raid prevention, but the possibility of larger maritime or combined-arms scenarios.

In the long term, these defenses are particularly effective against a bigger combined landing operation. These attacks from the sea would only complement the main attack from the north since Ukraine lacks the capabilities to land enough forces on Crimea and keep them supplied. It would require a sufficient number of landing ships, which Ukraine doesn’t have, and total dominance over the western part of the Black Sea, combined with air superiority. Although this scenario seems unlikely at first glance, Russia is actively preparing for it by installing anti-tank obstacles because the conditions around Crimea are worsening every day.

One of the reasons for Russia’s concern is that Russian advances along the front have stalled, while Ukrainian forces have recently begun making territorial gains across a broader section of the battlefield. At the same time, Ukraine's campaign of medium-range strikes against logistics infrastructure is becoming increasingly disruptive, steadily reducing the flow of fuel, ammunition, and other supplies into Crimea. Former Russian FSB officer and separatist commander Igor Girkin argued that Ukrainian drone strikes against transportation routes leading to Crimea resemble a classic battlefield-isolation strategy aimed at severing communications and supply lines deep behind the front. He warned that these attacks threaten logistics supporting Crimea, Russian forces along the lower Dnipro River, the Kinburn Spit, and coastal defense positions, adding that they could be preparing the conditions for a future Ukrainian offensive.

Overall, Russia’s newly built coastal fortifications in Crimea point to Russia’s perception of the peninsula’s strategic positions, which have been significantly weakened by Ukraine. As Russian forces face mounting attrition and supply shortages, the situation is likely to worsen further, forcing them to take defensive measures. The key implication is that Moscow is preparing for scenarios it believes it may not be able to reliably control or repel once they develop, which underlies uncertainty and fear.

💎 Help us expand the coverage! Subscription starts from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

Today, there are dangerous updates from the Russian Federation.

Here, Russia is facing an extraordinary plague outbreak in Siberia after a young laboratory worker died from a mysterious, severe pneumonia, and nearly two hundred potential contacts were placed under medical observation. Daria Shipilova, twenty-eight years old, worked at the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Research Institute and deteriorated rapidly after falling ill. The whole hospital was quarantined, public events were canceled, and Russia’s top public-health official Anna Popova traveled thousands of kilometers from Moscow to coordinate the response. Yet Russian authorities insist the regional situation remains stable, and that is where Russia’s story becomes increasingly strange.

According to the officially reported version, the lab official accidentally broke a test tube containing live plague bacteria while working. But Russian epidemiologist Mikhail Favorov publicly questioned that explanation, arguing that specialists handling dangerous pathogens work in protective equipment and describing infection through such an accident as unlikely. He also argued that the immediate arrival of the highest-ranking health officials in Russia indicates authorities were treating the situation extremely seriously, despite trying to project calmness to the public.

Russian authorities subsequently contradicted themselves and their own official laboratory-accident story, as they changed their version and stated that the woman died from pneumonia of unknown etiology, that testing found no microorganisms connected to her work, and that an investigation discovered no laboratory emergency involving dangerous pathogens.

Yet the precautions have been extensive, as nearly two hundred contacts were identified, several medical facilities introduced quarantine measures, preventive restrictions appeared elsewhere, and authorities launched an investigation. Meanwhile, officials initially avoided publicly identifying the suspected disease. One of the local leaders, Alexei Tsydenov, initially wrote that the woman had died from plague before subsequently modifying the statement to say she possibly had.

That combination has inevitably produced accusations of a cover-up, with the discrepancy obvious, as Moscow publicly minimizes the danger while simultaneously implementing measures appropriate for a potentially serious infectious incident.

The Kremlin has powerful reasons to prevent panic, as a genuine outbreak spreading beyond isolated contacts could force quarantines of whole towns, disrupt transportation and industrial production, consume medical resources, and create serious public anxiety at a time when Russian society is already on high alert as it feels the economic consequences of Putin’s campaign in Ukraine.

These consequences can become even more dangerous, as the Russian war machine depends upon enormous logistical networks moving soldiers, equipment, and ammunition across the country. A major infectious outbreak affecting transportation hubs, military facilities, or mobilization centers could interfere with troop rotations and training. Quarantines could remove personnel from duty, while outbreaks among tightly concentrated soldiers could temporarily disable entire formations, ending Putin’s war earlier than expected, as large-scale health restrictions would create another demand on government finances and manpower precisely when Moscow needs both elsewhere.

Overall, for the Russian government, controlling information may therefore become almost as important as controlling the medical situation. Russia has a long history of secrecy surrounding major disasters, from the nuclear power plant disaster in Chornobyl during the Soviet Union to the Kursk submarine sinking catastrophe, which Putin tried to hide at the beginning of his reign twenty-six years ago. Whether the event in Irkutsk ultimately proves to be a plague outbreak, another more common infection, or an isolated laboratory incident without major consequences, the conflicting explanations have already created precisely what the Kremlin would want to avoid: suspicion that the official story is concealing something considerably more serious. Something that could be the final nail in the coffin not only for Putin’s war against Ukraine but also for his regime.

💎 Help us expand the coverage! Subscription starts from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

Today, there are important updates from the Liman direction.  

Here, the gap between Russian official maps and battlefield reality around Liman has become extraordinary, as Russian command maps place their furthest claimed positions roughly forty kilometers west of the actual frontline and attribute another one-thousand-three-hundred-and-sixty square kilometers to Russian control. Such claims are based on an apparently AI-generated video purporting to show a Russian soldier in Chervonyi Oskil, after which Russian sources claimed the settlement had been captured, causing reaction from Russian military analysts, who are increasingly criticizing this trend of exaggerated reporting.

That fictional picture has become increasingly difficult to preserve as Ukraine’s Operation Vivaldi advances. To counter this in the information space, Russia’s Western Grouping of Forces released footage supposedly demonstrating continued Russian presence in Nove, Ridkodub, and other recently liberated settlements by the Ukrainians. But analysts quickly identified indications that the footage was archival, with the videos filmed when Russian forces originally captured these locations in two-thousand-twenty-five, before Ukraine’s counterattack, showing vegetation inconsistent with current conditions. Another clip from Ridkodub showed a Russian soldier moving through the settlement while Ukrainian FPV drones pursued him, but visual comparisons placed the recording around August last year.  

Russian military commentators have consequently begun attacking their own command’s response with the argument that the Ukrainian counterattack itself is less damaging than pretending it does not exist. Instead of acknowledging setbacks, determining why defenses failed and correcting them, Russian commanders publish old footage and maintain an increasingly fictional frontline, which creates consequences extending far beyond symbolic claims.

Russian soldiers witnessing Ukrainian advances while official channels insist nothing significant has happened have less reason to trust their commanders. Russian analysts have repeatedly warned that distorted reporting also damages battlefield decision-making: commanders can allocate reserves, artillery and drone coverage according to positions that exist on maps but not on the ground. The resulting disconnect can leave troops isolated and encourage demoralized soldiers to seek information elsewhere.

The real battlefield situation around Liman demonstrates why this matters, as Ukraine officially announced that its Third Army Corps has liberated settlement after settlement, releasing footage weeks after the events for operational security. The earlier penetration around Nove was particularly revealing, as the Ukrainian forces converted an old BTR into an unmanned explosive vehicle and managed to drive the relatively slow machine toward Russian defenses. Its ability to approach the target suggested Russian drone observation and fire control were not present there, because according to Russian maps, there was no threat to Ridkodub.  

Now Ukrainian pressure is extending toward the Zherebets River. Russian sources themselves have acknowledged Ukrainian activity around crossings and positions near Terny, while Ukrainian strikes against crossing points and rear logistics are complicating Russian resupply. Every restricted crossing creates another bottleneck where vehicles, ammunition and reinforcements become vulnerable to drones.

Yet Russian information management continues trying to preserve a battlefield picture increasingly contradicted even by Russian analysts. After losing substantial territory and suffering significant casualties, commanders are still releasing archival or AI-generated footage and defending claims built upon earlier exaggerated advances.

Overall, Russia may claim that the Lyman front has stabilized, but fighting remains active around the Zherebets approaches, with Ukrainian infiltrators crossing the river for quick raids. Ukraine is simultaneously applying ground pressure, attacking the crossings methodically and disrupting Russian rear logistics. The widening distance between Russia’s declared frontline and the battlefield itself is therefore becoming more than an information problem: it risks actively undermining Russia’s ability to organize the defense it now urgently needs to stop Ukraine’s counteroffensive and to prevent the Russian defense line behind the river from collapsing completely.

💎 Special Offer: starting from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

In this video, we will analyze how Russia’s decision to shift responsibility for defense backfired.

Here, unable to defend their own sky, the Russian authorities have told private companies to fend for themselves and protect their own facilities from Ukrainian strikes instead. However, the flawed nature of the plan and the organizational limitations have led to a complete defense failure, with cities burning.

The new policy immediately exposes several major weaknesses, as modern air defense depends on integrated command networks for rapid decision-making and coordinated engagement procedures by trained operators. Large corporations may have the money to buy equipment, but they generally lack the expertise necessary to operate military-grade systems effectively. More importantly, creating dozens or hundreds of separate defensive networks risks producing fragmented coverage across Russia. Wealthier companies may indeed succeed in protecting themselves, while less profitable facilities will remain exposed. Rather than strengthening national air defense, the policy risks creating a patchwork system full of exploitable gaps.

Officially, the measure of the Russian government was intended to increase the number of mobile air-defense groups and strengthen protection of strategic infrastructure. The idea was to allow private companies to purchase anti-aircraft artillery systems, radars, electronic-warfare equipment, and interceptor systems themselves. Unofficially, it reflects the much harsher reality in which the Russian military can no longer adequately defend the growing number of targets threatened by Ukrainian long-range drones.

However, due to the Russian officials fearing any future unrest, any military equipment used in this manner will not formally belong to the companies themselves. Instead, it will remain under military control and be operated through reservist formations attached to regional defense units.

The flaws in the plan became particularly visible during Ukraine's massive drone assault on Moscow, when waves of long-range drones penetrated even the heavily defended airspace around the capital. Russian authorities claimed hundreds of drones were intercepted, yet multiple still reached their targets. The Gazprom Neft refinery in Kapotnya, targeted already just days before, is the most important fuel-producing facility serving the Moscow region, supplying half of the capital's fuel consumption.

Videos recorded by residents showed drones flying at low altitude over Moscow before powerful explosions erupted around the refinery. Witnesses captured enormous fires, thick columns of black smoke, and huge secondary explosions, forcing temporary airport closures and damaging nearby infrastructure.

The attack highlighted how, when air defenses become saturated by large drone swarms and are used by inexperienced operators, mistakes become more likely. Failed interceptions, mistimed engagements, and falling debris caused damage of their own in Moscow. Defensive systems attempting to destroy incoming drones created additional hazards for the very infrastructure they are meant to protect, as clearly visible in the last attack when an air defense rocket hit a large oil storage tank and blew up its roof into the air.

What makes this development especially interesting is that Russia appears to be adapting a concept Ukraine introduced at the end of two thousand twenty five, when Ukrainian authorities authorized enterprises and licensed security organizations to participate in air defense. Companies were allowed to purchase remotely operated weapon stations, interceptor systems, and supporting equipment while integrating directly into a centralized Air Force command structure. By May this year, dozens of Ukrainian companies had reportedly joined the program, contributing to successful interceptions of eight five percent of Russian drones they targeted.

However, the crucial difference lies in implementation, as Ukraine grants participants meaningful operational flexibility while maintaining centralized coordination. Russia, by contrast, remains reluctant to provide private organizations with real control, with the hesitation stemming largely from political concerns and fear of mutiny. The stigma of providing companies and oligarchs with military-grade weapons is a heavy one in Russia, the last time this happened, a fifty-thousand strong Wagner army marched on Moscow. As a result, the Kremlin seeks additional defensive capacity while simultaneously ensuring that private entities never possess real independent military power capable of rivalling state control.

💎 Help us expand the coverage! Subscription starts from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

Today, there is important news from the Russian Federation.

Here, Ukraine’s campaign against Russia’s oil industry intensified, with explosions and fires reported at Lukoil’s massive Volgograd refinery. Processing roughly fifteen million tons annually, the facility produces gasoline, diesel and aviation kerosene essential to Russia’s economy and military. During the same attack wave, Ukraine also struck the Samara oil-distribution station, an important node involved in producing Russia’s oil export blend. These attacks followed an extraordinary week in which Ukraine reported strikes against six Russian refineries, demonstrating that individual raids can easily be turned into a systematic campaign with dangerous results for Russia.

As a result, the scale is becoming economically significant, as Ukraine’s Defense Ministry stated that more than fifty-one percent of Russia’s refining capacity has now been put out of operation, describing the objective as bleeding Russia’s military-economic system. Despite Putin acknowledging that attacks on energy infrastructure are affecting economic performance, his tactic is to translate this into a percentage change in gross domestic product only to hide the real economic effect and mislead the Russian public. Putin openly admitted a decrease of only about one percent of a roughly two-point-seven-trillion US dollar economy, which is approximately twenty-seven billion dollars. The broader cumulative consequences of the Ukrainian strikes, however, extend far beyond direct refinery damage through disrupted production, transportation, exports, repairs, and military fuel supplies, making опенUkrainian strikes deal even more harm due to their repetitive nature.

At Ilsky, Ukrainian drones damaged all three primary processing units, destroying almost the whole refining capacity. With the tank farm also damaged, production reportedly stopped at the key refinery supplying southern Russia and military logistics.

Novoshakhtinsk, capable of processing approximately five-point-six million tons annually, was also attacked by Ukrainian drones. Its connections to major rail and oil terminals make disruption there particularly damaging to fuel transportation across southern Russia.

Then Ukraine reached Perm, approximately one-thousand-and-five-hundred kilometers away. Fires were reported around several sections of the thirteen-million-ton Lukoil refinery, including the Avt-Five unit, responsible for roughly one-third of primary processing.

The next Ukrainian strike in Ufa also demonstrated that even distance no longer guarantees protection. Ukrainian drones attacked Bashneft’s enormous refining cluster more than one-thousand-three-hundred kilometers from Ukraine on consecutive days, damaging facilities producing diesel, gasoline, and aviation fuel.

At Kuibyshev in Samara, large fires were reported around the primary distillation infrastructure after incoming drone strikes. The refinery can process approximately seven million tons annually and produces substantial quantities of diesel, gasoline, and fuel oil, with the process now halted.

The Saratov refinery was hit again as well after previous strikes earlier this year. The Rosneft refinery processes up to seven million tons annually and produces fuels used by both civilian consumers and Russia’s military-industrial system.

The Ryazan refinery represents an even larger target, as it can process approximately seventeen million tons annually, and Ukrainian strikes ignited its primary-processing units, threatening an important source of motor fuel around Moscow.

Repeated strikes matter because repaired units can be damaged again, forcing Russia into an expensive cycle of restoration while simultaneously protecting an enormous network of refineries, pipelines and pumping stations. The consequences therefore extend far beyond destroyed equipment, as Russia requires petroleum products to move tanks, trucks and aircraft, while energy exports and taxation remain crucial sources of state revenue. Refinery disruption creates repair expenses, logistical bottlenecks, and pressure on domestic fuel availability while forcing additional resources into air defense.

Overall, Ukraine’s strategy is methodical, repeatedly attacking the infrastructure that converts Russian crude oil into economically and militarily valuable products. If Ukrainian estimates of more than half of refining capacity being disabled even temporarily are sustained, the pressure will increasingly reach Russia’s war machine itself. Putin must simultaneously finance the war, replace military losses, repair energy infrastructure, and protect facilities scattered across an enormous territory, while Ukrainian drones are demonstrating that increasingly little of that territory remains safely beyond their reach.

💎 Special Offer: starting from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

The Russians have now started to panic over the rapidly increasing threat to their enclave of Kaliningrad. This panic was caused by severely ramped up reconnaissance missions against Kaliningrad. Over the past year, Nato has intensified surveillance over Kaliningrad so much that it has trumped Nato satellite and aerial reconnaissance over Crimea, which is actively used to guide Ukrainian strikes. Nato Awacs aircraft fly along Kaliningrad practically every day, while satellite reconnaissance is conducted continuously. An entire US military satellite constellation now monitors Russian military facilities here on a daily basis, including the base in Baltisk, airfields, air defense positions, and other Russian Armed Forces facilities. Given how unprecedented the change of focus from Crimea to Kaliningrad is, these are preparations for the worst-case scenario to map out Russian military positions for targeting in the event of war.

This intensified reconnaissance has led Russian military analysts to believe Nato and Ukraine are preparing for a strike against Kaliningrad already in the near future. They quoted a German Air Force Commander Holger Neumann, who claimed that in the event of a Russian attack, Germany is ready to fight as early as tonight, and that Nato’s first targets would be strikes on Kaliningrad, the Kola Peninsula, Saint Petersburg, and the Black Sea. Kaliningrad is especially difficult for the Russians to defend as the semi-exclave is surrounded by Nato states that are actively reinforcing their borders with both troops and forward bases. This would make it convenient for Nato to blockade the region from the Baltic Sea, which is also completely surrounded by Nato countries, as since the addition of Sweden and Finland to the alliance it has effectively been nicknamed the Nato Sea.

What makes it even worse for Russia, Europe has already imposed an aerial blockade above Kaliningrad, and Russia can only resupply it by flying from Saint Petersburg through international waters. Because of how geographically exposed Kaliningrad is, in the event of a conflict, every land, sea and air corridor would be completely shut by Nato forces. This would force Russia to try to seize the Suwalki Corridor, which is the only land route connecting the region with Russian-allied Belarus. However, this corridor is located between two Nato countries, Poland and Lithuania, which is why such an operation would result in the outbreak of full-scale war.

Knowing the vulnerabilities of Kaliningrad, Putin resorted to threats and announced that attempts to cut off access to Kaliningrad from Russia’s mainland will lead to an unprecedented escalation, stating that any threat to the semi-exclave would be neutralized. To prove his point, he stressed the importance of the deployment of Oreshnik medium-range ballistic missiles in Belarus. The missile carries multiple warheads, including nuclear ones, and the flight to Lithuania and Poland would be covered in only two to four minutes, giving Nato a very short time window to intercept them. With this, Russia intends to dissuade Nato from blockading Kaliningrad.

However, Russia’s reaction to ramped-up Nato reconnaissance is ungrounded, suffering from logical fallacies and skewering of the truth. Russia has been building up its forces in Kaliningrad for years. Approximately ten thousand Russian troops are stationed there, along with nuclear-capable short-range Iskander ballistic missiles, able to hit multiple European capitals at a range of five hundred kilometers, including Berlin and Warsaw. Moreover, Russia has been using Kaliningrad for years to jam aerial and maritime GPS signals and force civilian aircraft to rely on on-board navigation systems, endangering them during their flight, as has even happened to the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen’s aircraft. Given these Russian hybrid escalations, Nato has only begun more active surveillance of the Russian threats that cause this, while repeatedly and openly refraining itself from more direct action. Despite the by all measures constrained reaction of Nato, Russians are choosing to play the victim, despite triggering mass surveillance through their own actions, panicking and complaining that they will soon be attacked by Nato, even before Nato can begin lifting an actual finger.

💎 Special Offer: starting from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

After recent offensive action in the Dnipropetrovsk sector, Ukraine's Skala special assault Regiment achieved a massive breakthrough and cleared seventy-five square kilometers of the grey zone, while pushing Russia's area of control back significantly further. The regiment reports that this is one of the most significant offensive operations by Ukrainian forces this summer. They report that Russian defenders in the sector have suffered a critical number of casualties, as well as losing several key deployment points and access routes necessary for their continued operations in the area.

This massive operation began shortly after Ukrainians already advanced over four-hundred square kilometers in the area earlier this year. After Russian lines broke, their high command urgently redeployed a significant number of forces to halt the Ukrainian advances; one of which was the one-hundred-twentieth Marine Infantry Brigade, along with even the full ninetieth Russian tank division, numbering an estimated total of over thirty-thousand enemy soldiers. Because of these reinforcements, Ukraine's advance was forced to halt, as any attack against such an overwhelming force would have been disastrous; So, the Skala special assault regiment had to find a way to remove the Russian equipment and marines from the equation, and allow Ukrainians to continue retaking the initiative.

This is why Ukrainian drone operators started the three-day-long Ashan operation, which was a larger concentrated drone campaign aiming to destroy Russian heavy equipment, as you may remember from a previous report. Among the targets were artillery pieces, such as the North Korean Koksan self-propelled artillery system, which deprived the arriving Russian soldiers of fire support that could have been used against advancing Ukrainian soldiers. After that, Ukrainian drones started targeting armored personnel carriers, which reduced their mobility. Then, Ukraine struck Russian soldiers to reduce the Russians’ manpower before they could be sent to the frontline to stop the Ukrainian advance. To disrupt the logistics of the already present enemy soldiers along the front, Ukrainian operators struck multiple Russian military trucks as well, simultaneously denying supplies and reinforcements for the Russians. As a result of the Ashan operation in this sector, Ukrainian drones destroyed one hundred and seven pieces of equipment in just three days and removed a substantial part of Russia’s firepower, transport, and logistics supporting the marine reinforcements.

To defend their land-based logistical routes before advancing, Ukraine has installed forty-two kilometers of anti-drone protection along roads in the Dnipropetrovsk region. These anti-drone nets allowed ammunition, reinforcements, and assault groups to move through the rear without every convoy being exposed to Russian FPV drones, while Russian equipment and supply traffic had been devastated. After these preparations, dozens of assault groups launched a simultaneous offensive from the Velykomykhailivka area with round-the-clock drone support. The Skala regiment first pushed through Ternovate and, after clearing it, moved towards the south, supporting the southern vector. Along this route, Ukrainian assault troops pushed towards Zaporizke and secured the right flank of the attack towards Ternove. At the same time, Ukraine expanded the breach north of these villages and captured Sichneve. This allowed the Ukrainians to use it as a springboard and advance even further eastward and attack Maliivka.

During the operation, Ukrainian reconnaissance drones identified Russian positions and targeted them with artillery, suppressing known firing positions before Ukrainian assault groups entered the settlements. This attack was further supported by FPV drones, which struck Russian soldiers who tried to hide after the artillery barrage. Additionally, heavy bomber drones attacked the scattered Russian soldiers by dropping ordnance on them. Russia tried to send reinforcements, but their armored vehicles were destroyed on the move by drones, eliminating them before they could help the defending Russians.

As a result of the attacks, Ukraine erased the Russian line as they advanced up to ten kilometers into Russian-held territory, liberating seventy-five square kilometers. This enabled Ukrainian forces to extend the reach of their drone operations and establish fire control over key Russian logistics routes in this sector.

This is what happened to Russia’s one hundred and twentieth Marine Infantry Brigade, which served as a reinforcement and suffered critical losses, rendering it combat ineffective. This forced the surviving elements to withdraw from the Dnipropetrovsk region, which is exactly what Ukraine needs to continue offensive operations

💎 Help us expand the coverage! Subscription starts from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

Today, the biggest news comes from the Kostiantynivka direction. 

Here, on the western flank of the city, Russian forces just launched a massive offensive trying to break through Ukrainian lines and envelop the defenders from the west. Doing so would place Ukrainian ground lines of communication into the city under complete Russian fire control, and starting the battle for the city of Druzhkivka to the north. Unfortunately for the Russians however, the  Ukrainian ninety-third mechanized brigade defending this crucial sector just released brand new footage that shattered any Russian hope of their offensive succeeding. 

Geolocated footage shows how their drones are detecting Russian infiltrators moving toward their lines in massive numbers. Immediately struck by FPV kamikaze drones, these Russian soldiers stand very little chance in the wide open fields. Russians next tried armored assaults in the sector, moving large numbers of infantry rapidly inside of massive cages mounted onto the tanks. Ukrainians showed how they made quick work of these assaults, burning the vehicles and stopping Russians in their tracks. Russian infantry that managed to dismount found themselves in the middle of a massive kill zone, and heavy bomber drones carpet-bombed the tree lines with mortar rounds to ensure that no one remained to attack Ukrainian positions. Additionally, these heavy bomber drones were also equipped with singular but much more heavy explosive devices, able to penetrate through the roofs of buildings where Russians were sheltering in and turning them into ruins. Russians quickly shifted to a lower-visibility approach, filling pickup trucks with infantry and bags of supplies to allow Russian infiltrators to stay on position for as long as possible. Striking them in the open fields, Russian infantry once again had nowhere to run to as they were left stranded without any cover. Russian motorbike assaults soon followed, but intense Russian shelling of the fields here meant that the motorbikes had to stay on the asphalt to maintain any speed during their attack. This made them even more easy to strike, as FPV drones and artillery worked together to shell the unprotected assaults with shrapnel and blast waves. Even at night Russians tried to break through, but made a critical mistake by leaving their headlights on to evade obstacles on the road. 

However, no defense remained impregnable, and a few Russian soldiers inevitably managed to evade detection and slip past the Ukrainian kill zone. Fortunately for Ukrainians, the ninety-third brigade houses skilled assault troops that conducted regular clearing operations of the settlements in the grey zone where Russian infiltrators could accumulate. Through this, Ukrainians were even able to push deeper into no-man's land, and repeatedly clear Russian underground positions and dugouts, preventing Russians from advancing through gradual consolidation. This critical component in modern warfare also resulted in a steady supply of surrendering Russian soldiers and important intel that Ukrainians were able to act on. This intelligence exposed unknown Russian infiltration routes, and allowed gaps in the line to be closed as soon as Russians found one. Russian electronic warfare also became increasingly countered, as the brigade is fielding a large number of fiber-optic-controlled FPV drones that do not need a wireless signal to the pilot, as can be seen from the coils of fiber optic wire exploding away from impacts. . This allowed Ukrainians to even strike in areas where signal strength had been exceptionally low due to terrain factors or damaged antennas. In the end, Russians have been completely unable for months to advance in the brigade’s sector of responsibility, and the western flank of Kostiantynivka continues to hold because of them. 

Overall, the Ukrainian ninety-third brigade has shown itself exceptionally capable in the defense of Kostiantynivka. Preventing the encirclement of the city’s defenders, they have countered each and every one of the different tactics and assaults that Russians have thrown at them. Through their active defense and clearing operations, they have worked with their Azov brigade neighbors to fully clear over one hundred kilometers of Russian infiltrators. As the Russians cannot seem to break through their lines, their plans to reach and capture Druzhkivka by the end of the year is falling apart at the seams.

💎 Help us expand the coverage! Subscription starts from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

Today, the biggest news comes from the Lyman direction.

Although the frontline around Lyman has barely moved, the intensity of the fighting has reached extraordinary levels. Russian forces are committing thousands of soldiers to repeated counterattacks in an effort to halt Ukrainian advances and restore their positions, but these assaults are coming at a tremendous cost. In Zarichne, Russian troops are attempting to push back Ukrainian infiltrators who are trying to cross the Zherebets River and advance into the centre of Torske. Meanwhile, in the forests east of Lyman, Ukrainian forces are clearing the remaining Russian positions north of Yampil. Russian troops are still present in the area, but their positions have become increasingly scattered, leaving them struggling to maintain a coherent bridgehead. Russia is also counterattacking inside Yampil itself, attempting to regain control of positions in the grey zone. Their objective is to reopen access to the vast forested areas beyond these positions, where Ukrainian forces could otherwise exploit gaps in Russian defences. These repeated attacks and counterattacks have gradually pushed the frontline towards a more stable position along the river, but that stability has come at a staggering human cost for the Russians.

At the end of September and the beginning of October, Russian forces suffered daily personnel losses exceeding two thousand on three separate occasions. On one of those days, reported losses reached two thousand and ninety, the highest daily figure since the beginning of Russia’s full-scale invasion. These losses reflect the intensity of Russia’s efforts to contain the Ukrainian counterattacks, as commanders continue sending troops into contested areas to prevent further advances and recover lost positions. 

This is largely because Ukrainian forces eliminated Russia’s drone operators and specialist personnel during Operation Vivaldi. A notable part of the operation involved Ukrainian drone operators using unmanned ground vehicles to reach Russian positions in the rear. These ground drones were used to strike concealed Russian shelters, command posts, and locations where Russian forces were concentrating and launching drones. The third Assault Brigade said these strikes destroyed a large number of such positions, along with the personnel operating from them. With fewer experienced drone operators and other specialized personnel available to support the frontline, Russia has increasingly had to compensate by committing large numbers of conventional troops to plug gaps, reinforce threatened positions, and launch repeated counterattacks. As a result, Russia is committing a significant portion of its available reserves simply to slow the Ukrainian advance and temporarily stabilize the frontline. This may prevent a total collapse of the Russian line, but it also means that large numbers of troops are being consumed just to maintain the current defensive line rather than being preserved for future operations.

This could be exactly what Ukraine was planning from the beginning, as proven by the commander of the Third Army Corps. Andriy Biletsky said that the Russian prisoners of war were lucky to have surrendered early, because the next stage of the operation will make the situation a lot worse for Russians. Based on his remarks, it is highly likely that the Ukrainian commanders anticipated that the Russians would launch massive meat wave attacks once the scope of Ukraine's counterattack became clear. As a result of these preparation, the Russians were walking straight into a trap, leading to their massive losses. 

Overall, the key issue is that Russia may be stabilizing the frontline while simultaneously exhausting the forces needed to hold it. By forcing Russia to commit more troops just to contain a limited area, Ukraine can turn every counterattack into a drain on Russia’s remaining combat power rather than simply fighting for territory. If Ukrainian commanders anticipated this response, the objective may have been not only to advance, but to provoke Russia into spending its reserves under increasingly unfavorable conditions. In that case, the real significance of the operation will be measured not by how far the frontline moves today, but by how much weaker Russia becomes when Ukraine launches its next phase.

💎 Help us expand the coverage! Subscription starts from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

Today, there are dangerous updates from the Russian Federation.

Here, Russia’s technology sector has suffered another major blow, as Ukrainian drones struck a second Yandex data center in just two days. This turns the initial attack into a broader campaign against Russian digital infrastructure, with President Volodymyr Zelensky confirming that Ukraine is responding to Moscow’s strikes against Ukrainian data centers.

In the morning hours today, drones struck Yandex’s facility in Kaluga, southwest of Moscow. Russian air defenses reportedly operated throughout the night, with regional authorities claiming twenty-six Ukrainian drones were intercepted. However, the facility suffered damage, as seen in footage published by locals, and later Yandex confirmed that several data-center modules were completely disabled, halting the operation of the data center.

The complex accommodates more than three-thousand-eight-hundred server racks, making it another significant component of Russia’s digital economy, as Yandex warned its customers that some services will experience interruptions while company engineers started assessing the damage.

And this was the second successful attack in just forty-eight hours, as Ukrainian drones struck Yandex’s largest data center in Sasovo yesterday, triggering a major fire and forcing operations to stop. The consequences are particularly serious because the facility houses two of the three supercomputers used to develop Yandex’s artificial-intelligence models, and Yandex subsequently acknowledged that the destruction was so extensive that it could not determine whether the damaged equipment could even be restored. Together, the attacks have affected two of Yandex’s five major data centers, representing forty percent of its principal facilities, eliminating this computing capacity and crippling critical infrastructure.

Yandex itself described data centers as the technological heart of its operations, as millions of Russians depend upon its services for navigation, transportation, entertainment, cloud storage, and everyday information. Hundreds of thousands of businesses also rely on its infrastructure for commercial operations. Normally, Yandex could compensate for damaged equipment by transferring workloads to unaffected facilities. However, that solution becomes increasingly difficult when multiple centers experience simultaneous outages, and with forty percent of the capacity gone, while the Ukrainian campaign is just starting, it may soon become impossible rather than just difficult.

Russian analysts warned that continued attacks could eventually exhaust the company’s ability to redistribute computing loads, creating substantially more serious consequences. This resembles the pressure Ukraine previously applied against Russian e-commerce infrastructure, including Wildberries and Ozon warehouses. Repeated attacks against different facilities imposed mounting repair costs and complicated efforts to maintain uninterrupted operations.

The difference is that digital infrastructure supports numerous economic activities simultaneously. Russia’s telecommunications providers, banking institutions, government agencies, and technology companies depend upon extensive data-center networks. The main Russian data centers are located in Samara, Yaroslavl, Krasnodar, Yekaterinburg, and Moscow, and are obviously lacking any protection, as confirmed by Yandex’s panicked decision in the aftermath of the first strike to censor the buildings on its own satellite map service.

For ordinary Russians, the consequences would probably appear gradually rather than through one nationwide internet blackout, as navigation applications would slowly become unreliable, online purchases would start failing, payment processing would slow down before stopping completely, and businesses would lose access to essential software and customer databases.

For Yandex and other data center operators, the financial consequences extend beyond immediate repairs, as repeated service interruptions threaten customer confidence, business contracts, and revenue while forcing additional investment into redundancy and physical protection against Ukrainian drones that have proven themselves highly effective.

Overall, the two Ukrainian strikes within forty-eight hours that damaged two key Yandex facilities are significant, as they exposed another major weakness in Russia’s protection of key infrastructure, this time essential to its digital economy. As the Ukrainian leadership announced the start of the campaign, the speed of this escalation also suggests that Moscow must now prepare for another sustained Ukrainian campaign.

💎 Help us expand the coverage! Subscription starts from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

Today, the biggest news comes from Ukraine.

Here, for the first time in twelve years, Ukraine has established a consistent drone presence over Crimea, creating a situation that would have been almost unthinkable only one year ago. According to Ukraine’s Unmanned Systems Forces, the four hundred and fourteenth Brigade Birds of Magyar carried out more than seven thousand missions over the summer as part of the Crimean Operation, with its drones repeatedly flying dozens of kilometers across the peninsula toward Russian targets. The scale of these operations is what makes the development so important, because Ukrainian drones are returning often enough to maintain constant pressure across Crimea. Russian forces now have to prepare for repeated attacks, turning Ukrainian drone activity over the peninsula into a regular occurrence of the battlefield.

Ukraine achieved this by first attacking the systems Russia uses to detect and shoot down incoming drones. In late August, Ukrainian forces struck a Nebo-SV radar, elements of a P-eighteen radar, and communications equipment near Olenivka, while a relay station near Frunze and a Russian military training center in Sevastopol were also hit. These systems help Russia detect incoming drones, track their route, and guide nearby air-defense units toward them before they can reach their targets. Just days later, Ukrainian strikes destroyed a Russian Pantsir-S-one air-defense system near Kerch, removing one of the weapons meant to intercept drones and missiles at shorter ranges. Losing these systems creates a much bigger problem than the loss of the equipment itself, because strikes on radars, communications equipment, and air-defense launchers open gaps throughout Russia’s defensive network. Each new gap gives later waves of Ukrainian drones a better chance of reaching more valuable targets deeper inside Crimea.

Once Ukrainian drones get through those defenses, the next targets are the airfields and aircrafts Russia keeps behind them. On August twentieth, Ukraine struck Saky airfield near Novofedorivka, destroying a Russian Su-twenty-four-M and four pieces of airfield support equipment. The strike showed that Ukrainian drones could reach Saky itself and destroy an aircraft on the ground together with equipment needed to keep the airfield operating. More importantly, overnight into September seventh, Ukrainian intelligence reported another successful strike on a Russian Su-twenty-four frontline bomber at Saky airfield, showing that even weeks after the previous attack, Russia had still not managed to keep Ukrainian drones away from its aviation. Russian airbases remained exposed to repeated Ukrainian attacks, even after commanders had already seen what Ukrainian drones were capable of reaching.

The real problem for Russia is that Ukraine keeps coming back before the damage from earlier strikes can be fully repaired. Replacing lost systems, relocating surviving aircraft, and reinforcing exposed bases all take time, giving Ukraine another window to strike before Russia can restore the same level of protection. Another Ukrainian attack can then force commanders to move resources again and restart parts of the recovery process. The October seventh strike near Dzhankoi showed that even these attempts to strengthen local defenses can be targeted, as Ukrainian forces hit a Russian mobile fire group, killing one serviceman and wounding another. Russia deploys these groups to hunt low-flying drones that slip past larger air-defense systems, while Ukraine can now target those smaller defensive units as well, making it harder for Russia to close the gaps left by earlier strikes. One weakness is repaired, another area needs more protection, and the pressure keeps moving across the peninsula.

Overall, the biggest change is that Crimea can no longer be treated as a secure rear area where Russia can base aircraft and other high-value assets with the same confidence as before. Protecting the most important airfields and bases means moving more systems toward them and potentially leaving other targets with less protection, while spreading those defenses across the peninsula makes it harder to protect any one location properly. Ukraine does not need to destroy every Russian air-defense system to benefit from this situation, because keeping enough drones in the air already forces Moscow to move defenses in response. If that pressure continues, Crimea will become increasingly expensive for Russia to use as a military rear area, even on days when Ukrainian drones do not destroy anything.

💎 Help us expand the coverage! Subscription starts from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

Today, there is interesting news from the Pokrovsk direction. 

Here, the Ukrainian counteroffensive is expanding, with Ukrainian forces opening a second axis between Dobropillia and Druzhkivka to clear the remnants of the Russian troops trying to entrench themselves in the area. The Skala Assault Regiment, operating alongside the Twelfth Azov Brigade, launched clearing operations around Hruzke and Novomykolaivka, establishing a blocking line designed to stop Russian infiltration toward Druzhkivka.

The operation relied heavily on infantry because Russian troops had dispersed through interconnected forest belts. Ukrainian commanders divided the assault force across three routes, carefully bypassing mines before moving toward the predetermined Russian positions. Every Ukrainian group received specific objectives, including where to attack and approximately how many Russian soldiers were expected there.

Crossing open ground was particularly dangerous because Russian FPV drones were constantly searching for Ukrainian troops in an attempt to help Russians on the ground dig in the forest. However, due to their own drone reconnaissance, Ukrainian soldiers were informed that everyone ahead of them could be treated as hostile, while a commander monitored their movement through a drone’s live feed, warning assault groups whenever threats appeared.

After reaching their designated positions, Ukrainian soldiers concentrated inside the forest belts before beginning successive assaults. Close-range fighting followed, with some Ukrainian soldiers wounded, but the advance continued while other troops remained behind on the flanks. This became crucial when some Russian forces attempted to move behind the advancing Ukrainians and cut them off, but the Ukrainian soldiers waiting in ambush intercepted them instead.

The Ukrainians then captured Russian radios, creating an immediate advantage because they could hear Russian movements and learned that enemy soldiers intended to deploy anti-personnel mines ahead of the Ukrainian advance. Instead, the Russian groups were located and eliminated before completing their task.

Russian drone operators eventually identified the previous Ukrainian ambush position and attacked it with six drones, but the Ukrainians had already relocated and advanced another one hundred meters, discovering another Russian position and eliminating it through coordinated action. After each position was cleared, Ukrainian soldiers consolidated while fresh groups moved through them to continue the attack.

Where Russian resistance became stronger, Skala requested support from Azov drone operators, who struck Russian positions before infantry advanced. This created a repeating cycle: locate, strike, assault, consolidate, and introduce another group to build on the success so far. Eventually, Skala cleared the new Russian attempt to resurrect the pincer, allowing the Azov Brigade to introduce consolidation forces.

The broader context makes this operation particularly important, as Ukrainian forces were already attacking from the Dobropillia direction after clearing Russian infiltrators south of Hruzke, so Russia subsequently attempted to shift infiltration farther east toward Novomykolaivka. Capturing positions there could have reopened a vector toward Druzhkivka and ultimately increased pressure against the wider Kramatorsk defensive area. Instead, the First Azov Corps, reinforced by Skala, continued systematically searching the forests and eliminating Russian infiltration groups, which effectively creates a second Ukrainian counteroffensive axis alongside the continuing operations around Dobropillia. Rather than merely reacting to individual Russian infiltrations, Ukrainian forces are attempting to construct a continuous protective belt south of Druzhkivka, denying Russia the ability to transform scattered infiltration groups into a sustainable breakthrough.

Overall, the Ukrainian Pokrovsk counteroffensive is therefore becoming more than simply eliminating the original Russian penetration. Ukraine is expanding sideways, securing the approaches toward Druzhkivka and constructing another defensive barrier. If this continues, Russia’s attempt to exploit the area toward Druzhkivka and threaten Kramatorsk risks being dismantled before it can develop into something significant.